A Review On Gender Socio-Economic Attributes And The Adoption Of Improved Oil Palm Production Technologies In The Southern Region Of Nigeria

Ekenta, C. M¹ , Obabire, I. E.² , Otegwu, T. C.³ , Adediran, O. I.⁴ , Ahmed,S. ⁵ , Abdullahi,M.⁵

¹Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria – Nigeria

²Department of Agricultural Technology Federal Polytechnic Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State

³Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology Gombe State University, Gombe State

⁴Kabba College of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Colleges

⁵Samaru College of Agriculture, Division of Agricultural Colleges Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria – Nigeria

Corresponding Author Email: cmcekenta@gmail.com

Abstract

Keywords

Download this article as:

Introduction

Inthe1960s,Nigeria’sagriculturalsectorwasthemostimportantintermsofitscontributionstodomesticproduction,employmentandforeignexchangeearnings.Nigeriabeforethediscoveryofcrudeoilinthe1950’swastheworld’slargestproducerofoilpalm(Elaeisguineensis)apositionnowoccupiedbyMalaysia[1].Oilpalmproductionwasoneofthevitalareasofagriculturethatattractedtheforeignexchangeearningscontributing48percentofGDPbetween1980and1982andfallingto45percentbytheendofthe1990’s[2].However,thefigureofoilpalm’scontributiondeclinedtoabout40percentofGDPand2percentoftotalexportearningsbytheendofthe1970s.Thisdwindlingtrendintheoilpalmproductionisalwaysattributedtothediscoveryofcrudeoilandgovernmentsshiftofattentionfromtheagriculturalsectortocrudeoilexploration.Thisassertioncannotbe overlooked but drawsattentionto the fact that otherareasthatarepotentialfactorstoimprovethe dwindlingtrend, needstobeaddressed.Areassuchastheefficiencyoftheextensionservicedelivery,laginthedisseminationofinnovationsfromtheresearchstationstothefarmers,genderissuesinagricultureandproperfarmereducationnecessaryfortheadoptionofimprovedtechnologiesareimportanttobeaddressed.Thisreviewthereforedrawsattentiontogendersocio-economicattributesthatareimportanttobeconsideredintheadoptionprocessinagricultureespeciallyasitrelatestooilpalmproduction.

Oilpalmproductionpassesthroughactivitiesthatrequiretheeffortsandcollaborationofbothmenandwomenformaximumoutput.Theroleofbothgenderscouldbeeithercomplimentaryorsupportivetoachievehighproductivity.Accordingto[3],genderisasociallyconstructedroledifferencesbetweenmenandwomenforthepurposeofallocatingpowers,duties,status,responsibilitiesandroleinanygivensocialcontext.Genderisaresultofsocializationintoamanorwomanrolewhichascribescertainbehavioursaccordingtosocio-culturalnormsforone’ssex[4].Accordingto[5],genderdealswiththesocialrelationshipbetweenmenandwomenandhowtheserelationshipsarenegotiatedintheproductionofgoodsandservices.ThesocialrelationshipbetweenmenandwomenwillplayoutandcomplementeachotherintheadoptionofimprovedoilpalmtechnologiessuchastheadoptionoftheTeneraoilpalmvarietywhichisahybridofthePisiferaandtheDuravarieties.Theconsiderationofgendersocio-economicattributesthereforebecomesimperative.

2.LiteratureReview

Thissectionprovidesa reviewofrelatedliteratureongenderrelatedconcepts,genderinagricultureandsocioeconomicattributesofgenderandhowitinfluencestheadoptionofimprovedoilpalmproductiontechnologiesinNigeria

2.1TheConceptofGender

Accordingto[6],theconceptofgenderincludestheexpectationsheldaboutthecharacteristics,aptitudesandlikelybehaviourofwomenandmen.Genderrolesandexpectationsarelearnedandcanchangeovertimeandvarywithinandbetweencultures.Systemsofsocialdifferentiationsuchaspoliticalstatus,class,ethnicity,physicalandmentaldisability,ageandmore,modifygenderroles[7].Theconceptofgenderisvitalbecause,appliedtosocialanalysis;itrevealshowwomen’ssubordinationormen’sdominationissociallyconstructed.Assuch,thesubordinationcanbechangedorendedUNESCO[6].Genderisnotbiologicallypredeterminednorisitfixedforever.Sexdescribesthebiologicaldifferencesbetweenmenandwomen,whichareuniversalanddeterminedatbirthandtechnicallydifferentfromgender.

Gendersystemsareinstitutionalizedthrougheducationsystems,politicalandeconomicsystems,legislation,cultureandtraditions.Inutilizingagenderapproach,thefocusisnotonindividualwomenandmenbutonthesystemwhichdeterminesgenderrolesandresponsibilities,accesstoandcontroloverresources,anddecision-makingpotentials.Itisalsoimportanttoemphasizethattheconceptofgenderisnotinterchangeablewithwomen.Genderreferstobothwomenandmen,andtherelationsbetweenthem.

2.2TheConceptofAdoption

Adoptionmeansthatapersondoessomethingdifferentlythanwhattheyhadpreviously(purchaseoruseanewproduct,acquireandperformanewbehavior,etc.)done.Thekeytoadoptionisthatthepersonmustperceivetheidea,behaviour,orproductasneworinnovative.Itisthroughthisthatdiffusionispossible[8].Adoptionofanewidea,behavior,orproduct(innovation)doesnothappensimultaneouslyinasocialsystem;ratheritisaprocesswherebysomepeoplearemoreapttoadopttheinnovationthanothers.Researchershavefoundthatpeoplewhoadoptaninnovationearlyhavedifferentcharacteristicsthanpeoplewhoadoptaninnovationlater.Whenpromotinganinnovationtoatargetpopulation,itisimportanttounderstandthecharacteristicsofthetargetpopulationthatwillhelporhinderadoptionoftheinnovation.Therearefiveestablishedadoptercategories,andwhilethemajorityofthegeneralpopulationtendstofallinthemiddlecategories,itisstillnecessarytounderstandthecharacteristicsofthetargetpopulation.

2.3GenderandTechnologyAdoption

Inaddressingtheinfluenceofgenderintheadoptionofagriculturaltechnology,itispertinenttoconsiderthematerialfactorsthatcouldpossiblyinfluencegenderinmakingthedecisiontoadoptorrejectaninnovation.Genders’accesstopowerandauthority,andcontroloversuchfactorsmaydeterminetheextentofadoption.Suchmaterialfactorsasaccesstoland,creditfacility;accesstootherinputsasfertilizer,labourandextensioncontactarevitalintheadoptiondecision.Thefemininegender,mostoftenthannot,havelessaccesstothesematerialfactorscomparedtothemasculinegender.Accordingto[9],womeninNigeriaformanactiveandreservelabourforcebutrarelyownthemeansofproduction.Furthermore,[10]reportedthatmenandwomenmaizefarmersinGhanadonotenjoyequalaccesstolandandtoagriculturalextensionservices.Thissuggeststhatdisparityinthegenders’ownershipandaccesstotheseproductionresourcesmayrestrictadoptionofinnovationbythefemininegender.

GenderrolesarecrucialforagriculturaldevelopmentandtheattainmentoftheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs).Thedefinitionofgenderusedinthisresearchistheeconomic,social,political,andculturalattributesandopportunitiesassociatedwithbeingmanorwoman.ThisreviewalsousesthedefinitionintheGlobalMonitoringReport2007ongender,whichmeansequalaccesstothe“opportunitiesthatallowpeopletopursuealifeoftheirownchoosingandtoavoidextremedeprivationsinoutcomes,”highlightinggenderequalityinrights,resources,andvoice[11].Genderissuesmustbeaddressedindevelopmentstudiesforvariousandobviousreasons.First,genderdimensioniscrucialforeconomicreasonsandfromtheefficiencypointofview.Thisisespeciallytrueintheagriculturesector,wheregenderinequalitiesinaccesstoandcontroloverresourcesarepersistent,underminingasustainableandinclusivedevelopmentofthesector.Second,equityordistributionalissuesarerelatedtogenderdifferencesinoutcomes.

3.GenderSocio-economicAttributesandAdoptionofImprovedOilPalmTechnologies

Socio-economiccharacteristicsexplaintheattributes(age,sex,householdsize,education,literacy,income,farmsize,landownership,maritalstatus,farmingexperienceetc)ofthefarmerthathaveinfluenceontheactivitiesofthefarmersintheirlocalenvironment.Asidesex,allotherattributesofthefarmerareacquireddirectlyorindirectlyandaresubjecttochangeovertime.Socio-economiccharacteristicslikeeducation,income,farmsize,landownershipandmaritalstatuspositsanindividualinaruralcommunityasresponsible,respectable,influentialandhasthepotentialsofbringingpositivechange.Examiningthesocioeconomiccharacteristicsoffarmersinaresearchgivestheresearcheraclearprofileanda betterperspectiveofthefarmersthatshouldnotbeneglectedaspossibleinfluentialfactors.Theybringtotheforethebackground,affiliations,dispositionsandorientationsofthefarmerswhoarethemajorfocusofagriculturalresearch.Socio-economiccharacteristicsinagenderstudywillpointoutareasofdisparityingenderissuesthatneedspecificattention.

Insomeculture,womenarenotallowedtoownsomeinputresourcesasagainsttheirmencounterparts.Accordingto[12],womeninArochukwuLocalGovernmentAreaofAbiaStatearenotallowedtoownoilpalmplantation.Thisthereforepreventsmostlywomeninthatareafromowninglandandotherresources.Thissinglesocialmisjudgmentleadstothelooseofvaluablecontributionsandbenefitsthatwouldhaveaccruedtothecommunityifbothmenandwomenaregivenequalfreedomtoexerciseandexploretheirpotentials.

3.1AgeandAdoption

Ageisanimportantattributeofthefarmer.Agemeasuredbythenumberofyearsfrombirthafarmerhasspentalive,influencesthelevelofthoughtanddisposition.Anolderfarmerisexpectedtohavemoreexperienceinfarmingandthereforethepossibilityofacceptinginnovation.Theageofthefarmerwillalsodisposehimtoacquisitionofmaterialresources.Intheirreport,[13]revealedthatthemeanageofthefarmersinoilpalmproductioninNigeriawasabout45yearsandexplainedthatthismaybeattributedtothefactthatoilpalmproductionislandintensiveandonlyolderfarmersmayhaveacquiredthesizeoflandneededforitsproduction.Inseparatereports[14]and[15]confirmedthatNigerianfarmersarewithintheagebracketof40-60years.Thiscouldadverselyaffectthelevelofoutputbecauseoftheinactivenatureoftheelderly.Theyfurthernotedthatyoungfarmersareneededonfarmsbecauseagriculturalproductionisenergydemandingespeciallyoilpalmproduction.[16],assertedthattheabilityofafarmertotakeriskandbeinnovativedecreaseswithage.Thisimpliesthatyoungerfarmersbyvirtueoftheirstrengthandabilitywillhavehigherprospectforincreasedadoptionoftechnologyandenhancedproductivity.

Accordingto[17],agricultureinAfricaisdominatedbyoldpeoplewhomheexplainedlackenthusiasmandstrengthwhichresultstothemengagingintraditionalsubsistencecultivationthatgivespoorreturns. Furthermore,[18]and[19]agreedthatmoreoftheyoungerwomenthanthemenareinvolvedinagriculturalproductioninthesoutheastagro-ecologicalzoneofNigeria.Thestudyfurtherexplainedthat52%ofmenand13.40%ofwomenwereabove59yearsofage.Thisimpliesthatmajorityofthewomenwereintheireconomicproductiveageandassuchwillbestrongerandeffectiveintheadoptionofinnovations.Inaddition,sincetheabilityofafarmertotakeriskandbeinnovativedecreasewithageasassertedby[16],thewomenfarmersaccordingtotheirstudywillbemoreinnovativeinadoptingimprovedagriculturaltechnology.Onthecontrarytothefindingsabove,[20]and[21]foundthatthereisnosignificantrelationshipbetweentheageoftherespondentsandthelevelofadoptionofimprovedoilpalmproductionpractices.Theyexplainedfurtherthatageisapersonalcharacteristicoffarmersanddoesnotinfluencetherejectionoradoptionofimprovedoilpalmproductionpracticesinthestudyarea.

3.2SexandAdoption

Sexidentifiesthestatusofthefarmerasmaleorfemale.Theassertionthatwomenaremoreactiveinagricultureandtheirinvolvementhavegeneratedsignificantrecognitionisnotindoubt[9].Inagreement,[22]reportedintheirstudythat72%ofwomenweremoreinvolvedinoilpalmproductioninthe study area of their research,while[23]observedthatwomenrecordedhigheradoptionofcassavaproductiontechnologiesthanmeninhisstudy.

Itisimportanttonotethatinvolvementofmenandwomendependsontheagriculturalactivitiesinvolved.Thisideaissupportedby[24]whopositedthatimpactofsexontechnologyadoptionistechnologyspecific.Agriculturalactivitiesthatrequiremorephysicalenergywillhavemoremaleparticipationasagainstwomen.Accordingto[20],foundthatmoremalefarmerswereinvolvedinoilpalmproductioninhisstudy.Thistheyassertedwasbecauseofthedrudgerynatureandphysicalenergydemand,andlargefinancialinvestmentneededforplantationestablishmentwhichcoulddiscouragewomen.Inseparatereports[25]andAde[26]foundthatmenaremoreinvolvedinagricultureintheirstudyareainWesternNigeria.Similarly,[27]reportedthatsexdistributionofpalmoilprocessorsinthestudyareashowedthatoutofthe120respondents,98(81.7%)weremales,while22(18.3%)werefemales.Thistheyexplainedcouldbeattributedtothefactthatmajorityoftherespondentsusedthetraditionalmethodofprocessingwhichismorestrenuousthanthemodernmethod.

Furthermore,[28]indicatedthatfemalesarelesslikelytoadoptimprovedtechnologies.Ontheotherhand,[21]foundthatsexhasnosignificantinfluenceontheadoptionofimprovedoilpalmproductionpractices.Thisfindingcontradictstheearlierthoughts.Beingamaleorfemalethereforedoesnotinfluencetheadoptionbehaviourofthefarmer.Theadoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnologiesbymenorwomenwillthereforedependonthematureofthetechnologiesinvolved.Technologiesthatarestrenuousrequiremoreenergyandaredrudgeryinnaturewillbeadoptedmostlybymenwhiletechnologiesthatareofthereversenaturemayhavemorefemalesadoptingsuchtechnologies.Therefore,theadoptionofimprovedoilpalmtechnologiesmayfavourmenbecauseofthephysicalstrengthinvolvedintheactivitiesandthehugefinancialrequirementstobeginanoilpalmbusinessinNigeria.

3.3LevelofEducationandAdoption

Educationasaprocessofacquiringknowledgethroughteaching,learning,observationandsocializationisanimportantattributethatinfluencestheactivitiesandbehaviourofindividuals.Adoptionisacontinuousprocesswhichbeginswiththeinitialknowledgeofaninnovationtotheconstantapplicationoftheinnovationineverydaylife.Assuch,theextentorlevelofeducationoftherespondentwillhaveinfluenceontheadoptionbehaviourofthefarmer(positivelyornegatively).Therefore,theeducationlevelofthemaleorfemalefarmerplayssignificantroleinhisorheradoptionbehaviour.Also,[21]foundthatlevelofeducationhassignificantinfluenceonthelevelofadoptionofimprovedoilpalmproductionpractices.Thistheyexplainedimpliesthatfarmerswithhigherlevelofeducationarelikelytofullyadopttheimprovedoilpalmtechnologiesthanthosewithloweducationalstatus.

Inapositiveproposition,[29]highlightedthesignificantroleoffarmers’educationinraisingfarmingefficiencyinEthiopiaandBangladesh.However,thereissomeagreementinliteraturethateducationsignificantlyinfluencesadoptionoftechnologicalinnovationsinagriculture[30]and[31].Thesefindingsarecontrarytothefindingof[32]thateducationhasnosignificantimpactonfarmers’efficiencyinIndonesia.Inasimilarreport,[19]reportedthat90.90and92.10%offemaleandmalesrespectivelyhadoneformofeducationintheareaoftheresearch.Further,thestudyreportedthattheaverageyearsspentbythefarmersinformaleducationforfemaleandmalefarmerswere7.33and8.10yearsrespectively.Thismeansthatthoughthefarmergroupsgenerallywerenotwelleducated,themalefarmerswhoaremoreeducatedthantheirfemalecounterparts,areexpectedtohavemoreabilityandwillingnesstoadoptimprovedagriculturaltechnologies.Ontheotherhand,[33]reportedthat51.30%and17.50%ofmaleandfemalesrespectivelyhadformaleducationwhile31.30%and40.00%ofmenandwomendidnothaveformaleducationintheirstudy.InthetraditionalNigeriansociety,menareaccordedwiththeopportunityofgoingtoschoolasagainsttheirfemalecounterparts.Thisisasaresultofthebeliefthatthemaleswillcontinuethefamilylineage.Theyounggirlsoftendropoutofschooltohelpinthefarm,engageintradingandotherventurestohelpthefamilyfinance.Mostoften,theyaremarriedofftoeasetheburdenofresponsibilitiesontheparents.Closelyrelatedtothisistheincidenceofgirl-childpregnancy.Theoccurrenceofthiswillaffectthesociallifeoftheyounggirlparticularlyhereducation.Menthereforeacquiremoreeducationandwillcertainlybemoredisposedtotheadoptionofimprovedtechnologies.

3.4FarmSizeandAdoption

Differentfactorsdeterminetheadoptionofdifferentagriculturalinnovationsandtechnologies.Muchempiricaladoptionliteraturefocusesonfarmsizeasthefirstandprobablythemostimportantdeterminant[34];[35];[36];[37];[38];[39];[40];[41];[42]and[43].Farmsizedefinesthefarmlandavailableforfarmerstofarm.Farmsizecanaffectandinturnbeaffectedbytheotherfactorsinfluencingadoption.Theeffectoffarmsizeonadoptioncouldbepositive,negativeorneutral[44].

InmostAfricanruralcommunities,farmlandsaremeasuredusinglocalmeasurements.Mostoftenfarmsizeisapportionedinplotswithinthelocalcommunities.Incitiesandsub-urbanareas,farmsizeismeasuredinacreandhectare.Culturally,anindividualthathaslargeplotsoffarmsizeisrevered,honouredandrespectedbecauseitisconsideredasastatussymbolwithintheculturalsetting.Itisbelievedthatthelargerthefarmsizeofanindividual,themorethepossibilityofacceptinginnovationsthatcouldincreaseproductivity.Accordingto[45],largefarmsizeintermsofhectaresandlabouraresignificantlyrelatedtofarmer’sutilizationofimprovedfarmpracticesapplicabletotheirfarmenterprise.

According totheirreport,[46]categorizedfarmerswhohadameanof2hectaresoffarmlandassubsistence.Theirfindingisinline[47]whoreportedthatvastmajorityoffarmersworkatnearsubsistencelevelofproductivity.Thistheyexplainedwilloftenhavenegativeeffectsonfarmers’accesstocreditsduetolackofeconomicsofscale.Further,[48];[49];[50];[51]and[52]foundfarmsizetobepositivelyrelatedtoadoption.

Ontheotherhand,[53]and[35]foundnegativerelationshipbetweenadoptionandfarmsizewhile[54]foundthattherelationshipbetweenfarmsizeandadoptionisaneutralone.Withsmallfarms,ithasbeenarguedthatlargefixedcostsbecomeaconstrainttotechnologyadoption[49],especiallyifthetechnologyrequiresasubstantialamountofinitialset-upcost.Inthisregard,[50]notedthatonlylargerfarmswilladoptthesekindsofinnovations.Withsometechnologies,thespeedofadoptionisdifferentforsmall-andlarge-scalefarmerswhichiscriticalforpolicymakersandimplementers.Accordingto[55],farmsizehasanegativeandsignificanteffectontechnicalefficiency,implyingthatfarmerswhohaverelativelylargefarmsarelessefficientrelativetotheircounterpartswithsmallerfarms.Thisresultthoughiscontrary,however,totheexpectationsthatlargefarmsbenefitfromincreasedeconomiesofscaleandhencearemoreefficient.Farmsizemayactasaproxyforothersocio-economicindicatorssuchasaccesstocreditbecausethelargerfarmhas,themorethecollateralvalue.Fromthegenderpointofview,therestrictionofaccessandownershiptolandonwomen,affectsadoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnologiesandagriculturaloutputingeneral.Theproblemarisesfromthetraditionallandownershipstructurewhichisdominatedbyinheritanceasthemajorsourceofownership.Womenwhobyvirtueofsocialconstructandtradition,donotinheritlandinmostAfricansocietyaredisadvantaged.

TheFAOreportof2010indicatedthatinheritanceisstillthemostcommonsystemtoobtainlandinmostdevelopingcountries.FAO’sgenderandlandrightsdatabaseof2010revealedtheexistenceofgenderdisparitiesinlandholdingsinallregionsoftheworld.Maliisacaseinpointwhereonly3%ofthecountry’slandownersarewomen,whereaslessthan2%oftheavailablelandworldwideisownedbywomen[56].Further,[56]confirmedthatlandrightsinmanycommunitiesaregovernedbybothstatutoryandcustomarylaws.ManyofthesetraditionalcustomarylawsespeciallyinNigeriaandAfricaingeneraldenywomenrighttoland.Bytradition,meninheritlandandwomengainuserrightsthroughtheirrelationshipwithamalerelative[57].Theimplicationisthatmenwiththeadvantageofhavingmorefarmsizewillconsideradoptionofimprovedtechnologiesmorethanwomen.

3.5LevelofIncomeandAdoption

Accesstofinanceisjustasimportantasaccesstolandinagriculturaldevelopment[58].Incomeandfinanceopportunitieshavebeenwidelydocumentedasanimportantstrategyforovercomingconstraintsfacedbytheruralfarmhouseholdsinmanydevelopingcountries[59];[60];Barrett,[61]and[62].

Incomeisexpectedtoprovidefarmerswithliquidcapitalforpurchasingproductivityenhancinginputssuchasimprovedseedandfertilizers[58].Accordingto[63],fundisamajorthreattotheadoptionofoilpalmproduction.Incomeplaysanimportantroleintheadoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnology.Accesstofundandcreditfacilityfacilitatetheprocurementofagriculturalinputs,labourengagementanddailyfarmexpenses.Inhisreport,[64]identifiedcreditfacilitiesprovisionasoneofthemostimportantpriorityareastobeconsideredinrepositioningtheoilpalmproductionsectorforsustainableeconomicdevelopment.Creditfacilitiessuchasgrantsandlowinterestloans,subsidizedinputprovision,landacquisitionfacilitationandprocurementofequipmentandmachineriesforprocessingareincentivesforincreasedproduction.

Thereisastrongassociationbetweenthegenderofthehouseholdheadandadoptionoftechnologicalrecommendations[65].Insomecountriesfemale-headedhouseholdsarediscriminatedagainstbycreditinstitutions,andassuchtheyareunabletofinanceyield-raisingtechnologies,leadingtolowadoptionrates[66].Thereisclearlyacaseforimprovingcurrentsmallholdercreditsystemstoensurethatwiderspectrumsofsmallholdersareabletohaveaccesstoincome,especiallyfemale-headedhouseholds[66].Thismay,incertaincases,necessitatedesigningcreditpackagesthataretailoredtomeettheneedsofspecifictargetgroups[66].

Accordingto[67],incomecreditfacilitiesavailabletofarmersaffectexpenditureontheuseofmechanicalequipment,workingcapitalaswellasimprovedseeds.Thisexplainsthatcreditandfundsintheformofincometothefarmerimprovestheexpenditureoutlayofthefarmerespeciallyintheprocurementofneededfarminputs.

3.6ExtensionContactandAdoption

Agriculturalextensionandruraleducationhavebeenemphasizedbydevelopmentexpertsascrucialinachievingagriculturaldevelopment,povertyreduction,andfoodsecurity[68];[69];[70];[71]and[72].However,empiricalevidenceshowsmixedresultsintermsoftherelevance,cost-effectiveness,andequitydimensionsofdifferentapproachesofagriculturalextensionserviceprovision[72]and[73].Ononehand,ratesofreturnandtheeconomiccontributionofagriculturalextensionareestimatedtobehigh[74];[68];[75].

InUganda,[76]estimatesan8–49%rateofreturnintheagriculturalextensionreformwhile[69]showthatreceivingatleastoneextensionvisitperyearreducesthelikelihoodofbeingpoorby10percentinEthiopia.Ontheotherhand,extensionsystemsanddeliverymethodsinmanydevelopingcountrieshavebeencritiquedasineffectiveinrespondingtothedemandsandtechnologicalchallengesofvarioustypesofclientsandinreachingpoormenandwomenfarmers[77];[73]and[70].

Accordingto[78],agriculturalextensionisamodebywhichthelatestinformationiscommunicatedtothefarmingcommunity.Theeffectiveextensionservicescanhelpintheadoptionofnewagriculturaltechnologieswhichcanleadtohighercropyieldsandmorehouseholdincomes.Inaddition,theagriculturalextensionservicescanhelpinreducingpovertylevelsandensurehouseholdfoodsecurityespeciallyamongsmallandresourcepoorfarmers.Similarly,[28]foundthatExtensionserviceprovision,intheformofadvicereceived,isasignificantfactorthatexplainswhetherfarmersadoptfertilizerorimprovedseed,andtherateofuseoftheseinputs.Otherextensionvariables,suchasfrequencyofvisit,accesstoradio,orattendanceatcommunitymeetingswerenotsignificant.Amajorprobleminsub-SaharanAfricaisthatyearafteryearextensionworkerswhoarehardlyaffordedin-servicetraining,andlooselylinkedtoresearch,continuetodisseminatethesamemessagesrepeatedlytothesameaudience[66].

Asituationhasconsequentlyarisenwherethedisseminatedmessagestothemajorityoftheextensionaudience,havebecometechnicallyredundantandobsolete[66].Additionalproblemisthatmostextensionservicestendtofocusonthewell-resourced,wealthierfarmersandperceivefarmersassimplyagentsofchange[66].Thissituationresultstomonotonyoftheinformationprovidedandleadtodiminishedinterestofthefarmersinhavingcontactswithextensionofficers.

Thegenderequitydimensionofagriculturalextensionserviceprovisionisanaspectthatiswidelyaddressedintheliterature.Fromtheglobalsurveyof115countriesbyFAOinthe1980stothemicro-studiesbyWorldBankandIFPRIin2010,numerousstudiesshowaccesstoextensionservicesislowerforwomenascomparedwithmen[79];[80]and[28].Whenotherfactorsarecontrolledfor,theresultsaremixedintermsofwhetherwomenaredisadvantagedornotinaccesstoextensionservices.Accordingto[28]fewerwomen(20%)werevisitedbydevelopmentagentscomparedtotheirmalecounterparts(30%)inEthiopia.Theresultsshowacleardifferencebetweenfemaleandmalesinaccesstovisitsandadvicefromdevelopmentagents(maleareabout5percentmorelikelytobevisitedbydevelopmentagentscomparedtofemale),aswellasotherchannelsofinformation.Malearemorelikelytoattendcommunitymeetingsandvisitdemonstrationplotsorresearchcentersmorethanwomen.InNigeria,thestoryisnotdifferent.Thelevelorreligiouspractices,traditionandthedominanceofthemalefolkinpoliticsandotherareasofadministrationinthecountryinhibitthelevelofaccesstoextensionservicesbywomencomparedtomen.

3.7YearsofFarmingExperienceandAdoption

Theyearsofexperienceofthefarmeriscountedasadvantageintheadoptionprocess.Experiencedisposesthefarmertodifferentagriculturaltechniques,useofmaterialinputs,extensionandfarmnetworksandmaturityinhandlingandovercomingdifficultsituations.Theexperienceofmenandwomeninthefarmingprocessisvitalintheadoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnology.Variousresearchershavecommentedontheyearsofexperienceofmenandwomenintheirdifferentfindings.Inaresearchfinding,[19]reportedthattheaveragefarmingexperiencesforbothmaleandfemalefarmerswere30.09and24.22yearsrespectivelyinSoutheastagro-ecologicalzoneofNigeria.Thestudyfurtherrevealedthat70.50%offemalesand55.40%ofmalesrespectivelyhadfarmingexperiencesofbetween11to30years.Similarly,[81]positedthatmenhadmorefarmingexperiencesthanwomen.Theyreportedthat70%ofthewomenhavebeeninvolvedinfarmingfor15yearsorless.Thiscouldbeduetothefactthatwomenspentpartoftheirproductiveyearsinchildbearingwhichwillnotonlylimitwomen’slevelofinvolvementinagriculturalproductionbutalsolimittheirincomeastheywillnotbeabletoworkduringthechildbearingperiods.

4.TheWayForwardinMainstreamingGenderinNigerianAgriculture

Gendermainstreamingisagenderconceptwithanapproachthatensuresthatwomenandmenequallyparticipateineveryaspectofaprogramorprojectbothasbeneficiariesanddecisionmakers.Thisrequiresthatattentionisgiventogenderperspectivesasanintegralpartofallactivitiesacrossallprogrammes.Itinvolvesmakinggenderperspectives–whatwomenandmendoandtheresourcesanddecision-makingprocessestheyhaveaccessto–morecentraltoallpolicydevelopment,research,advocacy,implementationandmonitoringofnormsandstandards,planning,implementationandmonitoringofprojects.

ThisreviewmakesinputsasthewayforwardinmainstreaminggenderintheagriculturesectorinNigeriathroughthefollowingprocesses:

4.1TheProcessofDevelopingNationalAgriculturalDevelopmentPoliciesandPlans

Policywhichisoftenseenasaprogramofactionsorsetofprinciplesinsettingadevelopmentagendatogetherwithplanningwhichbridgesthegapfromwhereweareandwherewewanttobethroughchartingfuturecourseofactionsareveryvitalineverydevelopmentprocess.Bothgeneralandspecificruralagriculturesectorpoliciesshouldfromthedrawingboardembracegenderbyspecifyingtherolesofmenandwomen.Equalparticipationofmenandwomenintheselectionofcommitteemembersandorconstitutingaboardtodraftpolicyforthesectorshouldbeencouraged.InNigeria,agricultureisafamilybusinessinvolvesallmembersofahousehold(menandwomen)inclusiveandinmostcasesmoreparticipationfromthewomenthatthemenespeciallyintheruralareas.Tothateffect,policiesaimedatsustainablydevelopingthesectorshouldbeallembracingandgendersensitive.

4.2TheProcessofBudgetingandAgriculturalFinancing

Gender-responsivebudgetingaimsatmainstreaminggenderintopublicfinance.Gender-responsivebudgetingdoesnotimplyhavingseparatebudgetsforwomenandwomenbutconnotesageneralbudgetthatareplanned,approved,executed,monitored,andauditedinagender-sensitiveway.TheagriculturesectorinNigeriaisanareathatrequiresmassivefundingespeciallywiththeagriculturaltransformationagendaoftheFederalGovernment.Theagendalayingemphasisoncommercialagricultureandamorearticulatestrategytoreachouttothefarmerspromptlyrequiresanallembracingapproachthatwillrecognizegenderissues.Areasofimpedimentstoaccessingagriculturalfinancesforbothmenandwomenshouldbejettisoned.

4.3ProcessofEmployment

Globally,womenandgirlsareunderrepresentedinalmostallsectorsofdevelopmentincludingeducationandemploymentopportunitiesdespitethefactthatwomenconstitutemorethanhalfoftheworld’spopulation[82].Employmentinmostcountriesischaracterizedwithalopsidedapproachweremoremenorwomenhavemoreorlessadvantageincertainareasofopportunity.InNigeria,toforgeameaningfulagriculturaldevelopmentprocessemploymentindifferentareasofthesectorshouldbegendersensitive.ParticularlytomentionistheimbalanceacrossthestatesoftheFederalintheemploymentofextensionagents.MostAgriculturalDevelopmentProject(ADP)staffsaremenwithastaggeringnumberofwomenintheirmist.ThiswillnotmakeforgoodextensionservicedeliveryespeciallyintheNorthernpartofthecountrywheremenhaverestrictionsinenteringsomehouseholdsbecauseofreligiouspractices.

4.4AbolitionofCulturalLandInheritancePractices

Acrossthetraditions,culturesandcustomsofthedifferentethnicgroupsinthecountry,landownershipisbyinheritance.AsidetheHausacustomwhichallowsawomantoinheritfrombothparentsandmostoftenhalfoftheshareofthemalesons,allothercustomsareskewedagainstwomen.Thecustomarylandownershipstructureensuresthatallareasoflandholding,womenareexcludedaslandpassesfromthefathertothemalechildren.Anunmarrieddaughterhasarighttoliveinherfather’shouse,butisnotallowedtocultivatethelandasherown.Landasthemostimportantfactorinagriculturalproductionanddevelopmentrequiresthatitsacquisitionbelegislatedupontogiveequalopportunitytobothmenandwomentohavelandforagriculturalproduction.The1999constitutionoftheFederalRepublicofNigeriachapter2,section43providesthat“everycitizenofNigeriashallhavetherighttoacquireandownimmovablepropertyanywhereinNigeria”.Theacquisitionoflandasprovidedbytheconstitutionisarightandaprivilege.

5. Conclusions

Thisreviewexaminedbymakingtechnicalanalysisoftheviewsofdifferentauthorspresentedingenderdisaggregateddataofthesocio-economicattributesofgenderasitrelatestotheadoptionofimprovedagriculturaltechnologies.Thestudieslookedatgenderdifferentialsintheadoptionofvarioustechnologiesandinnovationsinagriculture.Therewerevariationsinthefindingsofthesestudieswithregardstoinputs,crops,areaofthestudy,technologyexamined,aswellastheresearchdesigns,samplingframe,samplesize,qualityofdatacollection,toolsandanalyticaltechniquesadopted.However,thestudiesunanimouslyrecognizedandemphasizedareasofgenderimbalanceinvariousaspectsofagriculturewhichneedtobeaddressedforincreasedoutputandefficiency.

Intheirreports,[83];[84];[85]and[86]recognizedtheheterogeneousnatureofwomenfarmersfromdifferentculturalbackground,orientationandreligion.Accordingtothem,thereisneedtocollectdifferentindicatorsofgenderforarobustanalysisorpropertargetingofbeneficiariesandendusers.Thisimpliesthatdatacollectedongenderindicators(socioeconomicfactors),methodsofdatacollectionandanalysistheyaresubjectedtoareveryvitalanddeterminestoalargeextenttheresults.

Therelevanceofgenderrolesinagriculture,generallifeactivitiesandprojectdesigncannotbeover-emphasized.Basically,indesigningandimplementingpublicprojectsmeantforthebenefitofthemasses,takingagendersensitiveapproachallowsfortherudimentaryunderstandingofgenderrolesintheprojects,identifyareasofgenderimbalanceandtherootcausesofexistinginequalitiesifthereare,sothattheycanbeaddressedintheprojectoractivitydesign.The review further identifiedtheshortandlongtermdifferentialneedsandprioritiesofmenandwomen and how toharmonizetheseneedsforefficiencyandgrowth.Therefore,nationalgovernmentatalllevelsshouldmainstreamgenderinalladministrativeactivities–politicsandpolicy,economic,socialculturalandenvironmentalissuesforthesustainabledevelopmentofthesociety.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT   

I acknowledge Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETfund), Nigeria for sponsoring the research from where this article was written.

---

REFERENCES

[1] E.A.Onwubuya,E.N.Ajani,andH.Nwalieji,AssessmentofOilPalmproductionandprocessingamongruralwomeninEnugunorthagriculturalzoneofEnuguState,Nigeria.InternationalJournalofAgriculturalSciences,2(12),322–329,2012.

[2] T.A.Oyejide,E.O.OgunkolaandO.B.AlabaNigeria.Tradepolicyresearchandtrainingprogram.DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofIbadan,Nigeria,2003.

[3] USAID(UnitedStatesAidforInternationalDevelopment).GenderassessmentforUSAIDNigeria,developmenttechnologysystem,Inc.,2005.

[4] A.StephensGenderissuesinagriculturalandruraldevelopmentpolicyinAsiaandthePacific.Thailand.RapaPublication,Bangkok,1993.

[5] A.G.Ironkwe.GenderinvolvementinYamminisetttechnologydevelopment,TransferandutilizationinSouthEastagroecologicalzoneofNigeria.UnpublishedPhDdissertation,departmentofruralsociologyandextension,MichaelOkparaUniversityofagriculture,Umudike,Umuahia,AbiaState,Nigeria.P.186,2011.

[6] UNESCO.Gendermainstreamingimplementationframework;Baselinedefinitionsofconceptsandterms.Genderworkingdocument,2003.

[7]    C.March,I.Smyth,andM.Mukhopadhyay,Aguidetogender-analysisframeworks;Oxfam,1999.

[8]    E.M.Rogers.Diffusionofinnovation.4^thedition.NewYork.TheFreePress.P.206,1995.

[9] S.A.Rahman.Genderdifferentialinlabourcontributionandproductivityinfarmproduction:EmpiricalevidencefromKadunaStateofNigeria.PaperpresentedatthenationalconferenceonfamilyheldatNewTheatreComplex.BenueStateUniversity,Makurdi,Nigeria.1^st-5^thMarch,2004.

[10]  M.L.MorrisandC.R.Doss.Howdoesgenderaffecttheadoptionofagriculturalinnovations?ThecaseofimprovedmaizetechnologyinGhana.Presentedasaselectedpaperattheannualmeeting,Americanagriculturaleconomicsassociation(AAEA)Nashville,Tennessee,1999.

[11]WorldBankGlobalMonitoringReport.Millenniumdevelopmentgoalsconfrontingthechallengesofgenderequalityandfragilestates.Washington,DC:WorldBank,2007).

[12] A.E.Agwu.AdoptionofimprovedOilPalmproductionandprocessingtechnologiesinArochukwulocalgovernmentareaofAbiaState,Nigeria.AgroScienceJournalofAgriculture,FoodEnvironmentandExtension,5(1),25-35,2006.

[13]  P.A.OnohandC.A.Peter-Onoh.AdoptionofimprovedOilPalmproductiontechnologyamongfarmersinAbohMbaiselocalGovernmentareaofImoState.InternationalJournalofAgricultureandRuralDevelopment,15(2),966–97,2012.

[14] E.E.Ekong.Ruralsociology:AnintroductionandanalysisofruralNigeria.3^rdEdition.Uyo,Doveeducationalpublishers,2010.

[15]  O.Solomon.GenderanalysisofOilPalmproductionandprocessinginOkiti-pupaareaofOndostate,Nigeria.AnunpublishedMScThesissubmittedtotheDepartmentofAgriculturalExtensionandRuralDevelopment,UniversityofIbadan,Ibadan,52,1994.

[16] J.C.Nwaru.RuralcreditmarketsandarablecropproductioninImoStateofNigeria.UnpublishedPh.D.Dissertation.MichaelOkparaUniversityofAgriculture,UmudikeNigeria.123pages,2004.

[17]  M.Gitau.ChallengesandissuesfacedbyAfricanYouthsinagriculture:Youthagro-environmental initiative. Retrieved on 30^th November, 2014. http://yagrein.blogspot.com/p/home.html,2011.

[18]  A.G.Ironkwe,K.C.EkweandE.O.Mbanaso.Participationofextensionagentsinresearch–extension–farmers–input–linkagesystem(REFILS)activitiesinAbiaState.JournalofAgriculturalExtension,9,109-115,2006.

[19]  A.G.Ironkwe.GenderInvolvementinREFILSforEffectiveAgriculturalTransformationinSoutheastAgro-EcologicalZoneofNigeria.InternationalJournalofAgriculture.andRuralDevelopment,16(2),1476–1485,2013.

[20] O.O.Ibitoye,A.O.Akinsorotan,N.T.Meludu,andB.O.Ibitoye,FactorsaffectingOilPalmproductioninOndoStateofNigeria.JournalofAgricultureandSocialResearch11(2),97–105,2011.

[21] J.N.Anaglo,S.D.Boateng,A.SwanzyandK.MFelix.TheinfluenceofadoptionofimprovedOilPalmproductionpracticesonthelivelihoodassetsofOilPalmFarmersinKwaebibiremDistrictofGhana.JournalofBiology,AgricultureandHealthcare,4(1),88–94,2014.

[22] O.E.Ayinde,M.Muchie,A.H.Adenuga,M.O.Jesudun,F.I.Olagunji,andM.O.Adewumi.FoodsecurityandemerginginnovationinOilPalmproductioninOsunState,Nigeria.PakistanJournalofNutrition,11(11),1009–1013,2012.

[23] S.N.Odurukwe.GenderdifferencesinadoptionofrecommendedimprovedCassavaproductiontechnologiesinImoState,Nigeria.JournalofAgricultureandSocialResearch,3(2),126–134,2003).

[24]  M.Kassie,Zikhali,P.,Manjur,K.andEdwards,S.(2009).Adoptionoforganicfarmingetchniques:Evidencefromsemi-aridregionofEthiopia.Environmentofdevelopment.discussionPaperSeries.

[25]  A.A.Jibowo.Essentialofruralsociology:Abeokuta.GbemiSodipoPressLimited,1992.

[26]    O.AAtibioke,I.Ogunlade,A.A.Abiodun,B.A.Ogundele,M.A.Omodara,andA.R.Ade.EffectsofFarmers’demographicfactorsontheadoptionofgrainstoragetechnologiesdevelopedbyNigerianstoredproductsresearchinstitute(NSPRI):AcasestudyofselectedvillagesinIlorinwestofKwaraState.ResearchonHumanitiesandSocialSciences,2(6),56–63,2012

[27]  C.O.EmokaroandP.C.Ugbekile.EconomicanalysisofOilPalmprocessinginOviaNorthEastandIkpoba-OkhaLocalGovernmentAreasofEdostate,Nigeria.NigerianJournalofAgriculture,FoodandEnvironment,10(2),70-78,2014.

[28] C.Ragasa,G.Berhane,F.Tadasse,andA.S.Taffesse,Effectsofextensionservicesontechnologyadoptionandproductivityamongfemaleandmalefarmers.Genderdifferencesinaccesstoextensionservicesandagriculturalproductivity.EthiopiastrategysupportprogramII.ESSPWorkingPaper49,2013.

[29] H.A.Z.Mahmudul,K.Tanigichi,andA.Ishida.Theimpactoffarmers’educationonincomeinBangladesh.JournalofJapaneseSocietyofAgriculturalTechnologyManagement,11(1),13–21,2004.

[30]  M.N.Asadullah.FarmproductivityandefficiencyinruralBangladesh:Theroleofeducationrevisited.SAEWPS/2005-10,2005

[31] A.S.LangyintuoandM.Mekuria.ModellingagriculturaltechnologyadoptionusingthesoftwareSTATA,presentedatatrainingcourse,econometricapplicationtomodellingtheadoptionofagriculturaltechnologies,21-25,Harare,internationalMaizeandWheatimprovementcentre(CYMMT),Harare,2005.

[32] R.LlewelynandJ.R.WilliamsNonparametricanalysisoftechnical,puretechnical,andscaleefficienciesforfoodcropproductioninEastJava,Indonesia.AgriculturalEconomics,15.113–126,1996.

[33] O.F.DejiandG.F.KoledoyeGenderanalysisofFishfarmingtechnologiesadoptionbyFarmersinOndoState.ScientificReseacrhandEssays,8(26),1219–1225,2013.

[34]  P.B.Shakya,andJ.C.Flinn.AdoptionofModernVarietiesandFertilizeruseonRiceintheEast,1985.

[35] J.K.Harper,M.E.Rister,J.W.Mjelde,B.M.DreesandM.O.Way.FactorsinfluencingtheadoptionofInsectmanagementtechnology.AmericanJournalofAgriculturalEconomics,72(4),997–1005,1990.

[36] D.A.G.GreenandD.H.Ng’ong’ola.FactorsaffectingFertilizeradoptioninlessdevelopedcountries:AnapplicationofmultivariatelogisticanalysisinMalawi.JournalofAgriculturalEconomics,44(1),99–109,1993.

[37]A.A.AdesinaandJ.BaiduForsonFarmers’perceptionsandadoptionofnewagriculturaltechnology:EvidencefromanalysisinBurkinaFasoandGuinea,WestAfrica.JournalofAgriculturalEconomics,13,1-9,1995.

[38] E.Nkonya,T.SchroederandD.Norman.FactorsaffectingadoptionofimprovedmaizeseedandfertilizerinnorthernTanzania.JournalofAgriculturalEconomics,48(1),1-12,1997.

[39]J.Fernandez-Cornejo.EnvironmentalandeconomicconsequencesoftechnologyadoptionIPMinviticulture.Agricultural.

        Economics,18,145–155,1998

[40]  J.Baidu-Forson.FactorsinfluencingadoptionoflandenhancingtechnologyintheSahel:LessonsfromacasestudyinNiger.JournalofAgriculturalEconomics,20,231-239.,1999.

[41] K.Boahene,T.A.B.Snijders,andH.Folmer.Anintegratedsocioeconomicanalysisofinnovationadoption:ThecaseofhybridcocoainGhana.JournalofPolicyModeling,21(2),167–184,1999.

[42]  C.R.DossandM.L.MorrisHowdoesgenderaffecttheadoptionofagriculturalinnovation?ThecaseofimprovedMaizetechnologiesinGhana.JournalofAgricultural

        Economics,25,Pp.27–39,2001.

[43] L.DakuAssessingfarmlevelandaggregateeconomicimpactsofoliveintegratedpestmanagementprogramsinAlbania.PhD.Dissertation,VirginiaPolytechnicInstituteandStateUniversity,David,LynneRienerPublishers,2002.

[44] A.Mamudu,E.Akudugu,S.Guo,andD.Kwesi.AdoptionofmodernagriculturalproductiontechnologiesbyfarmhouseholdsinGhana:Whatfactorsinfluencetheirdecisions?JournalofBiology,AgricultureandHealthcare,2(3),1–13,2012.

[45] S.K.T.Williams,J.M.Fenley,andC.E.Williams.AmanualforagriculturalextensionworksinNigeria.LesShyraden,Ibadan.127–13,1984).

[46] M.U.DimeluandV.Anyaiwe.PrioritiesofsmallholderOilPalmproducersinIkalocalgovernmentareaofDeltaState:ImplicationforagriculturalextensionserviceinNigeria.WorldJournalofAgriculturalScience,7(2),117–12,2011.

[47] M.Cobezas,F.Emhardt,andH.Kutzbatch.ConvertibleequipmentfromOxenCartaWorkingPaperSeries2.SpecialResearchProgramme308.UniversityofHohenheim,1995.

[48] K.T.McNamara,M.E.WetzsteinandG.K.Douce.Factorsaffectingpeanutproduceradoptionofintegratedpestmanagement.ReviewofAgriculturalEconomics,13,129-139,1991.

[49] I.O.C.AbaraandS.SinghEthicsandbiasesintechnologyadoption:ThesmallFarmArgument.TechnologicalForecastingandSocialChange,43,289-300,1993.

[50] G.Feder,E.R.JustandD.Zilberman.Adoptionofagriculturalinnovationsindevelopingcountries:Asurvey.EconomicDevelopmentandCulturalChange,33,255-298,1985.

[51]  J.Fernandez-Cornejo.ThemicroeconomicimpactofIPMadoption:Theoryandapplication.AgriculturalandResourceEconomicReview,25,149-160,1996.

[52]  V.Kasenge.Socio-economicfactorsinfluencingthelevelofsoilmanagementpracticesonfragileland.Inproceedingsofthe16^thconferenceofsoilsciencesocietyofEastAfrica(Eds).:Shayo-Ngow,1998.

[53] D.Yaron,A.DinarandH.Voet.Innovationsonfamilyfarms:TheNazarethregioninIsrael.AmericanJournalofAgriculturalEconomics,361-370,1992.

[54]  M.Mugisa-Mutetikka,A.F.Opio,M.A.Ugen,P.Tukamuhabwa,B.S.Kayiwa,C.NiringiyeandE.Kikoba.LogisticRegressionAnalysisofAdoptionofNewBeanVarietiesinUganda.Unpublished,2000.

[55]  G.M.Diiro.(Impactofoff-farmincomeonagriculturaltechnologyadoptionintensityandproductivity.EvidencefromruralMaizeFarmersinUganda.UgandanstrategicsupportprogrammeofInternationalfoodpolicyresearchinstitute(IFPRI),1–13,2013.

[56] FAO.ThestateoffoodinsecurityintheWorld:Addressingfoodinsecurityinprotractedcrises.Rome,2010.Retrievedon30^thNovember,2014.http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1683e/i1683e.pdf,2010

[57] L.Cotula.Theoutlookonfarmlandacquisitions.Internationalinstituteforenvironment,development(IIED),Policybrief,March2011.

[58] L.K.NjeruandB.M.Gichimu.InfluenceofaccesstolandandfinancesonKenyanyouthparticipationinagriculture.AReviewofInternationalJournalofDevelopmentandEconomicSustainability,2(3),1–8,2014.

[59]  A.DeJanvryandE.Sadoulet.IncomestrategiesamongruralhouseholdsinMexico:Theroleofoff-farmincome.WorldDevelopment,29(3),467–480,2001.

[60] M.Iiyama,P.Kariuki,P.Kristjanson,S.Kaitibie,andJ.Matimali.Livelihooddiversification,incomesandsoilmanagementstrategies:AcasestudyfromKerioValley,Kenya.JournalofInternationalDevelopment,20,380–397,2008.

[61]  C.B.Barrett,T.Reardon,andP.Webb.Non-farmincomediversificationandhouseholdlivelihoodstrategiesinruralAfrica:Concepts,dynamics,andpolicyimplications.FoodPolicy,26,315–331,2001.

[62] T.Reardon,K.Stamoulis,andP.Pingali,Ruralnonfarmemploymentindevelopingcountriesinaneraofglobalization.AgriculturalEconomics,37,173–183,2007.

[63]  K.O.Soyebo,A.J.Farinde,andE.D.Dionco-Adetayo.ConstraintsofOilPalmproductioninIfecentrallocalGovernmentareaofOsunState,Nigeria.JournalofSocialScience,10(1),55–5,2005.

[64] P.C.Ajieh.AnassessmentofFarmers’perceptionofpriorityareasinOilPalmproductionandprocessinginAniochasouthlocalgovernmentareaofDeltaState,Nigeria.JournalofAgricultureandVeterinaryScience,3(6),5-10.www.iosrjournals.org,2013.

[65] S.BisandaandW.Mwangi.Farmers’AdoptionofImprovedMaizeVarietiesinMbeyaRegionoftheSouthernHighlandsofTanzania,1996.

[66]  R.Mkandawire.AgrarianchangeandfoodsecurityamongsmallholdersinMalawi,1993.

[67] J.O.Owolabi,B.Z.Abubakar,andM.Y.Amodu.Assessmentoffarmers(Women)accesstoagriculturalextension,inputsandcreditfacilityinSabon-GarilocalGovernmentareaofKadunaState,NigerianJournalofBasicandAppliedScience,19(1),87-92.http://www.ajol.info/index.php/njbas/index,2011.

[68] B.Swanson,R.Bentz,andA.Sofranko.Improvingagriculturalextension.Areferencemanual.Rome:FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO),1997.

[69] S.Dercon,D.Gilligan,J.Hoddinott,andT.Woldehanna.TheimpactofagriculturalextensionandroadsonpovertyandconsumptiongrowthinfifteenEthiopianVillages.AmericanJournalofAgriculturalEconomic,91(4),1007–1021,2009.

[70]  K.Davis.Extensioninsub-saharanAfrica:Overviewandassessmentofpastandcurrentmodels,andfutureprospects.JournalofInternationalAgriculturalEducationandExtension,15(3),15–28,2008.

[71] B.SwansonandR.Rajalahti.Strengtheningagriculturalextensionandadvisorysystems:Proceduresforassessing,transforming,andevaluatingextensionsystems.Agricultureandruraldevelopmentdiscussionpaper45.Washington,DC:WorldBank.,2010.

[72] G.Feder,R.Birner,andJ.Anderson.Theprivatesector’sroleinagriculturalextensionsystems:Potentialandlimitations.JournalofAgribusinessinDevelopingandEmergingEconomies,1(1),31–54,2011.

[73] R.Birner,K.Davis,J.Pender,E.Nkonya,P.Anandajayasekeram,J.Ekboir,A.Mbabu,D.Spielman,andD.Horna.Discussionpaper37.Washington,DC:Developmentstrategyandgovernancedivision,Internationalfoodpolicyresearchinstitute,2006.

[74] D.Birkhaeuser,R.E.EvensonandG.Feder.Theeconomicimpactofagriculturalextension:Areview.EconomicDevelopmentandCulturalChange,39(3),607–640,1991.

[75]  J.Alston,C.Chan-Kang,M.Marra,P.PardeyandT.J.Wyatt.Ameta-analysisofratesofreturntoagriculturalresearchanddevelopment.ExPedeHerculem?IFPRIResearchReport113.Washington,DC:InternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute,2000.

[76] S.Benin,E.Nkonya,G.Okecho,J.Randriamamonjy,E.Kato,G.Lubade,andM.Kyotalimye.Returnstospendingonagriculturalextension:Thecaseofthenationalagriculturaladvisoryservices(NAADS)programofUganda.AgriculturalEconomics,42(2),249–26,2011.

[77] W.M.Rivera,K.M.Qamar,andL.V.Crowder.Agriculturalandruralextensionworldwide:Optionsforinstitutionalreformindevelopingcountries.Rome:FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO),2001.

[78]A.AliandD.B.Rahut.Impactofagriculturalextensionservicesontechnologyadoptionandcropsyield:EmpiricalevidencefromPakistan.AsianJournalofAgricultureandRuralDevelopment,3(11),801-812,2013

[79] B.Swanson,B.J.FarmerandR.Bahal.Thecurrentstatusofagriculturalextensionworldwide.Inreportoftheglobalconsultationonagriculturalextension,editedbyB.E.,1990.

[80] WorldBank,andInternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute.Genderandgovernanceinruralservices:InsightsfromIndia,Ghana,andEthiopia.Washington,DC:WorldBank;InternationalFoodPolicyResearchInstitute,2010.

[81] I.O.EwebiyiandK.Arimi,GenderdifferentialsinadoptionofimprovedCassavaproductiontechnologyinOgunState,Nigeria.JournalofMedicalandBiologicalSciences,(2013).

[82]  FederalMinistryofEducation.NationalPolicyonEducation.Lagos:ERDC,2004)

[83]  C.R.Doss.Twenty-fiveyearsofresearchonwomenFarmersinAfrica:Lessonsandimplicationsforagriculturalresearchinstitutions;withanannotatedbibliography.”CIMMYTeconomicsprogrampaper00-02.Mexico,D.F.:CentrointernacionaldeMejoramientodeMaízTrigo(CIMMYT),1999.

[84] C.R.Doss.DesigningagriculturaltechnologyforAfricanWomenFarmers:Lessonsfrom25YearsofExperience.WorldDevelopment,29(12),2075–2092,2001.

[85] A.QuisumbingandL.Pandolfelli.Promisingapproachestoaddresstheneedsofpoorfemalefarmers:Resources,constraints,andinterventions.WorldDevelopment,38(4),581-592.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.006,2009.

[86] A.Peterman,J.Behrman,andA.Quisumbing.Areviewofempiricalevidenceongenderdifferencesinnonlandagriculturalinputs,technology,andservicesindevelopingCountries,Washington,D.C.IFPRI,2010.